GPT-6 Astra (medium) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (medium) by OpenAI or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (medium) scores 23.4 points higher (49.7 vs 26.3) but costs 2.5× as much to run the benchmark ($2434 vs $993; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick GPT-6 Astra (medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K2.7 Code.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (medium) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 49.7 | 26.3 | −47.1% Kimi K2.7 Code is 47.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,434.12 | $992.88 | −59.2% Kimi K2.7 Code is 59.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.81s | 41.22s | +160.7% Kimi K2.7 Code is 160.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs GPT-6 Astra (medium): 47.1% less intelligence, 59.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 160.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
GPT-6 Astra (medium)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-medium/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-medium/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill