GPT-6 Astra (Medium) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Medium) by OpenAI or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Medium) scores 3.3 points higher (49.6 vs 46.3) but costs 12× as much to run the benchmark ($2434 vs $207; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Medium) when you need intelligence above 46.3, and MiMo-V2.6-Pro when 46.3 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Medium) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 49.6 | 46.3 | −6.7% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 6.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,434.12 | $206.66 | −91.5% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 91.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.48s | 48.29s | +233.5% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 233.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs GPT-6 Astra (Medium): 6.7% less intelligence, 91.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 233.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6 Astra (Medium)MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-medium/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-medium/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill