GPT-6 Astra (Medium) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Low)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Medium) by OpenAI or Qwen3.8 27B (Low) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Medium) scores 23.4 points higher (49.6 vs 26.2) but costs 2.1× as much to run the benchmark ($2434 vs $1165; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick GPT-6 Astra (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.8 27B (Low).
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Medium) | Qwen3.8 27B (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 49.6 | 26.2 | −47.2% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 47.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,434.12 | $1,164.93 | −52.1% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 52.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.89s | 58.18s | +290.7% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 290.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Low) vs GPT-6 Astra (Medium): 47.2% less intelligence, 52.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 290.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6 Astra (Medium)Qwen3.8 27B (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-medium/qwen3-8-27b-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-medium/qwen3-8-27b-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill