GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) vs Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) scores 41.1 points higher (52.4 vs 11.3) but costs 89× as much to run the benchmark ($3803 vs $42.5; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 11.3, and Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) when 11.3 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) | Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.4 | 11.3 | −78.4% Mistral Small 4 (Reas… is 78.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,802.98 | $42.50 | −98.9% Mistral Small 4 (Reas… is 98.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 163.27s | 14.50s | −91.1% Mistral Small 4 (Reas… is 91.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) vs GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh): 78.4% less intelligence, 98.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 91.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh)Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-xhigh/mistral-small-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-xhigh/mistral-small-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill