GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) vs Muse Ember (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Muse Ember (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) scores 19.3 points higher (55.3 vs 36.0) but costs 32× as much to run the benchmark ($3746 vs $117; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 36.0, and Muse Ember (Max) when 36.0 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) | Muse Ember (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 55.3 | 36.0 | −34.9% Muse Ember (Max) is 34.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,746.22 | $117.12 | −96.9% Muse Ember (Max) is 96.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 250.23s | 10.09s | −96.0% Muse Ember (Max) is 96.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Ember (Max) vs GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh): 34.9% less intelligence, 96.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 96.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) scores 56.40 for $3360.
- Muse Ember (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh)Muse Ember (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-xhigh/muse-ember · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-xhigh/muse-ember?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill