GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) scores 7.3 points higher (52.4 vs 45.1) but costs 2.7× as much to run the benchmark ($3803 vs $1433; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh).
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.4 | 45.1 | −13.9% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 13.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,802.98 | $1,433.35 | −62.3% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 62.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 182.46s | 27.32s | −85.0% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 85.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) vs GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh): 13.9% less intelligence, 62.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 85.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh)Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-xhigh/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-xhigh/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill