GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh)
Muse Wonder (Max) vs GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh): the same intelligence, 52.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 74.3% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.4 | 52.4 | Even |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,802.98 | $5,786.78 | +52.2% Muse Wonder (Max) is 52.2% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 176.59s | 45.32s | −74.3% Muse Wonder (Max) is 74.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-xhigh/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-xhigh/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill