GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) scores 27.2 points higher (52.4 vs 25.2) but costs 8.9× as much to run the benchmark ($3803 vs $428; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 25.2, and Qwen3.7 Plus when 25.2 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.4 | 25.2 | −51.9% Qwen3.7 Plus is 51.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,802.98 | $427.73 | −88.8% Qwen3.7 Plus is 88.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 176.59s | 45.45s | −74.3% Qwen3.7 Plus is 74.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh): 51.9% less intelligence, 88.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 74.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-xhigh/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-xhigh/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill