GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) scores 12.5 points higher (52.4 vs 39.9) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($3803 vs $2632; both flagship class). Pick GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.4 | 39.9 | −23.9% Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 23.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,802.98 | $2,632.05 | −30.8% Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 30.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 176.59s | 64.93s | −63.2% Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 63.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh): 23.9% less intelligence, 30.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 63.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh)Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-xhigh/qwen3-8-2-4t-a95b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-xhigh/qwen3-8-2-4t-a95b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill