GPT-6 Astra (Max) vs GPT-6 Luna (Medium)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Max) by OpenAI or GPT-6 Luna (Medium) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Max) scores 22.8 points higher (52.7 vs 29.9) but costs 171× as much to run the benchmark ($5324 vs $31.2; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Max) when you need intelligence above 29.9, and GPT-6 Luna (Medium) when 29.9 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Max) | GPT-6 Luna (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.7 | 29.9 | −43.3% GPT-6 Luna (Medium) is 43.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,324.10 | $31.17 | −99.4% GPT-6 Luna (Medium) is 99.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 275.53s | 8.25s | −97.0% GPT-6 Luna (Medium) is 97.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Luna (Medium) vs GPT-6 Astra (Max): 43.3% less intelligence, 99.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 97.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- GPT-6 Luna (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6 Astra (Max)GPT-6 Luna (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra/gpt-6-luna-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra/gpt-6-luna-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill