GPT-6 Astra (Max) vs Grok 4.7 (Low)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Max) by OpenAI or Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Max) scores 10.5 points higher (52.7 vs 42.2) but costs 3.3× as much to run the benchmark ($5324 vs $1631; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Max) when you need intelligence above 42.2, and Grok 4.7 (Low) when 42.2 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Max) | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.7 | 42.2 | −19.9% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 19.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,324.10 | $1,630.69 | −69.4% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 69.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 275.53s | 11.28s | −95.9% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 95.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Low) vs GPT-6 Astra (Max): 19.9% less intelligence, 69.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 95.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6 Astra (Max)Grok 4.7 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra/grok-4-7-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra/grok-4-7-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill