GPT-6 Astra (Max) vs Kimi K3 (Low)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Max) by OpenAI or Kimi K3 (Low) by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Max) scores 22.6 points higher (52.7 vs 30.1) but costs 4.5× as much to run the benchmark ($5324 vs $1190; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Max) when you need intelligence above 30.1, and Kimi K3 (Low) when 30.1 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Max) | Kimi K3 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.7 | 30.1 | −42.9% Kimi K3 (Low) is 42.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,324.10 | $1,190.42 | −77.6% Kimi K3 (Low) is 77.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 280.51s | 51.29s | −81.7% Kimi K3 (Low) is 81.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $3.00 / $15.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3 (Low) vs GPT-6 Astra (Max): 42.9% less intelligence, 77.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 81.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Kimi K3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6 Astra (Max)Kimi K3 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra/kimi-k3-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra/kimi-k3-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill