GPT-6 Astra (Max) vs Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Max) by OpenAI or Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Max) scores 19.0 points higher (52.7 vs 33.7) but costs 3.1× as much to run the benchmark ($5324 vs $1737; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Max) when you need intelligence above 33.7, and Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) when 33.7 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Max) | Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.7 | 33.7 | −36.1% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 36.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,324.10 | $1,737.18 | −67.4% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 67.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 280.51s | 21.12s | −92.5% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 92.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs GPT-6 Astra (Max): 36.1% less intelligence, 67.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 92.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6 Astra (Max)Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra/muse-spark-1-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra/muse-spark-1-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill