GPT-6 Astra (Max) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Max) by OpenAI or Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Max) scores 7.6 points higher (52.7 vs 45.1) but costs 3.2× as much to run the benchmark ($5324 vs $1655; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Max) when you need intelligence above 45.1, and Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) when 45.1 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Max) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.7 | 45.1 | −14.4% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 14.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,324.10 | $1,655.27 | −68.9% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 68.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 328.93s | 29.43s | −91.1% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 91.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) vs GPT-6 Astra (Max): 14.4% less intelligence, 68.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 91.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6 Astra (Max)Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill