GPT-6 Astra (Max) vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Max) by OpenAI or Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Max) scores 40.0 points higher (52.7 vs 12.7) but costs 23× as much to run the benchmark ($5324 vs $234; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Max) when you need intelligence above 12.7, and Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) when 12.7 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Max) | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.7 | 12.7 | −75.9% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 75.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,324.10 | $233.56 | −95.6% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 95.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 388.52s | 22.73s | −94.1% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 94.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.23 / $2.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) vs GPT-6 Astra (Max): 75.9% less intelligence, 95.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 94.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6 Astra (Max)Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill