GPT-6 Astra (Max) vs Qwen3.7 Max

Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Max) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.

Trade-off

OpenAIGPT-6 Astra (Max)Off the frontier

Intelligence: 52.70
Total cost: $5324

AlibabaQwen3.7 MaxOff the frontier

Intelligence: 29.50
Total cost: $2277

Verdict

Depends on your budget

GPT-6 Astra (Max) scores 23.2 points higher (52.7 vs 29.5) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($5324 vs $2277; both flagship class). Pick GPT-6 Astra (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.7 Max.

Metric	GPT-6 Astra (Max)	Qwen3.7 Max	Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)	52.7	29.5	−44.0% Qwen3.7 Max is 44.0% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)	$5,324.10	$2,277.12	−57.2% Qwen3.7 Max is 57.2% cheaper
End-to-end time (lower is better)	280.51s	16.63s	−94.1% Qwen3.7 Max is 94.1% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)	$10.0 / $50.0	$2.50 / $7.50
Input modalities	Text, Image	Text

Qwen3.7 Max vs GPT-6 Astra (Max): 44.0% less intelligence, 57.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 94.1% faster end-to-end.

Open this matchup in the interactive picker GPT-6 Astra (Max): what beats it Qwen3.7 Max: what beats it

Today's Pareto frontier

Against the frontier

GPT-6 Astra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.

GPT-6 Astra (Max)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model

Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill