GPT-6 Luna (High) vs Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (High) by OpenAI or Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) scores 0.8 points higher (33.7 vs 32.9) but costs 36× as much to run the benchmark ($1737 vs $47.9; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 32.9, and GPT-6 Luna (High) when 32.9 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (High) | Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.9 | 33.7 | +2.4% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 2.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $47.85 | $1,737.18 | +3530.5% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 36× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.20s | 21.36s | +31.9% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 31.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs GPT-6 Luna (High): 2.4% more intelligence, 3530.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 31.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6 Luna (High)Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-high/muse-spark-1-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-high/muse-spark-1-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill