GPT-6 Luna (High) vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (High) by OpenAI or Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) scores 6.7 points higher (39.6 vs 32.9) but costs 29× as much to run the benchmark ($1385 vs $47.9; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 32.9, and GPT-6 Luna (High) when 32.9 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (High) | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.9 | 39.6 | +20.4% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 20.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $47.85 | $1,385.40 | +2795.3% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 29× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.65s | 21.09s | +44.0% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 44.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs GPT-6 Luna (High): 20.4% more intelligence, 2795.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 44.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6 Luna (High)Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-high/muse-spark-1-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-high/muse-spark-1-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill