GPT-6 Luna (High) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (High) by OpenAI or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 19.5 points higher (52.4 vs 32.9) but costs 121× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $47.9; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 32.9, and GPT-6 Luna (High) when 32.9 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (High) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.9 | 52.4 | +59.3% Muse Wonder (Max) is 59.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $47.85 | $5,786.78 | +11993.6% Muse Wonder (Max) is 121× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.65s | 44.47s | +203.5% Muse Wonder (Max) is 203.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs GPT-6 Luna (High): 59.3% more intelligence, 11993.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 203.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
GPT-6 Luna (High)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-high/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-high/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill