GPT-6 Luna (High) vs Step 3.5 Flash

GPT-6 Luna (High) vs Step 3.5 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-6 Luna (High)On the frontier
Intelligence
32.90
Total cost
$47.9
StepFunStep 3.5 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.60
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-6 Luna (High)Step 3.5 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)32.916.6−49.5% Step 3.5 Flash is 49.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$47.85Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)14.65s18.75s+28.0% Step 3.5 Flash is 28.0% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.50$0.10 / $0.30
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-6 Luna (High): what beats itStep 3.5 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-high/step-3-5-flash-0202 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-high/step-3-5-flash-0202?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill