GPT-6 Luna (Low) vs GPT-6 Sol (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Low) by OpenAI or GPT-6 Sol (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (Max) scores 26.1 points higher (47.6 vs 21.5) but costs 144× as much to run the benchmark ($1536 vs $10.6; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Sol (Max) when you need intelligence above 21.5, and GPT-6 Luna (Low) when 21.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Low) | GPT-6 Sol (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.5 | 47.6 | +121.4% GPT-6 Sol (Max) is 2.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $10.63 | $1,535.80 | +14347.8% GPT-6 Sol (Max) is 144× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.60s | 87.14s | +1220.3% GPT-6 Sol (Max) is 1220.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Sol (Max) vs GPT-6 Luna (Low): 121.4% more intelligence, 14347.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1220.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Low) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6 Sol (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6 Luna (Low)GPT-6 Sol (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-low/gpt-6-sol · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-low/gpt-6-sol?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill