GPT-6 Luna (Low) vs Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)

GPT-6 Luna (Low) vs Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-6 Luna (Low)On the frontier
Intelligence
21.50
Total cost
$10.6
MetaLlama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
5.40
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-6 Luna (Low)Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)21.55.4−74.9% Llama 3.2 Instruct 11… is 74.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$10.63Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)7.32s19.59s+167.6% Llama 3.2 Instruct 11… is 167.6% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.50$0.34 / $0.34
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-6 Luna (Low): what beats itLlama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-low/llama-3-2-instruct-11b-vision · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-low/llama-3-2-instruct-11b-vision?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill