GPT-6 Luna (Low) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Low) by OpenAI or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 16.4 points higher (37.9 vs 21.5) but costs 10× as much to run the benchmark ($110 vs $10.6; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash when you need intelligence above 21.5, and GPT-6 Luna (Low) when 21.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Low) | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.5 | 37.9 | +76.3% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 76.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $10.63 | $109.55 | +930.6% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 10× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.60s | 49.53s | +650.5% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 650.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna (Low): 76.3% more intelligence, 930.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 650.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Low) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6 Luna (Low)MiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-low/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-low/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill