GPT-6 Luna (Low) vs Ministral 3 14B
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Low) by OpenAI or Ministral 3 14B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (Low)
Ministral 3 14B vs GPT-6 Luna (Low): 72.1% less intelligence, 253.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 11.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Low) | Ministral 3 14B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.5 | 6.0 | −72.1% Ministral 3 14B is 72.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $10.63 | $37.56 | +253.3% Ministral 3 14B is 3.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 7.07s | 7.88s | +11.5% Ministral 3 14B is 11.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.20 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Low) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GPT-6 Luna (Low)Ministral 3 14BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-low/ministral-3-14b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-low/ministral-3-14b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill