GPT-6 Luna (Low) vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Low) by OpenAI or Mistral Medium 3.5 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (Low)
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs GPT-6 Luna (Low): 34.0% less intelligence, 11789.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 172.1% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Low) | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.5 | 14.2 | −34.0% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 34.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $10.63 | $1,263.80 | +11789.0% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 119× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.60s | 17.96s | +172.1% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 172.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $1.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Low) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6 Luna (Low)Mistral Medium 3.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-low/mistral-medium-3-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-low/mistral-medium-3-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill