GPT-6 Luna (Low) vs Mistral Small 3.2
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Low) by OpenAI or Mistral Small 3.2 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (Low)
Mistral Small 3.2 vs GPT-6 Luna (Low): 67.4% less intelligence, 1045.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 89.4% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Low) | Mistral Small 3.2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.5 | 7.0 | −67.4% Mistral Small 3.2 is 67.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $10.63 | $121.78 | +1045.6% Mistral Small 3.2 is 11× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.60s | 12.50s | +89.4% Mistral Small 3.2 is 89.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.07 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Low) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
GPT-6 Luna (Low)Mistral Small 3.2Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-low/mistral-small-3-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-low/mistral-small-3-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill