GPT-6 Luna (Low) vs Muse Ember (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Low) by OpenAI or Muse Ember (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Ember (Max) scores 26.3 points higher (36.0 vs 9.7) but costs 13× as much to run the benchmark ($117 vs $9.09; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Ember (Max) when you need intelligence above 9.7, and GPT-6 Luna (Low) when 9.7 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Low) | Muse Ember (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.7 | 36.0 | +271.1% Muse Ember (Max) is 3.7× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $9.09 | $117.12 | +1188.4% Muse Ember (Max) is 13× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 7.40s | 10.09s | +36.4% Muse Ember (Max) is 36.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Ember (Max) vs GPT-6 Luna (Low): 271.1% more intelligence, 1188.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 36.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Low) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Ember (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6 Luna (Low)Muse Ember (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-low/muse-ember · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-low/muse-ember?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill