GPT-6 Luna (Low) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Low) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Plus scores 3.7 points higher (25.2 vs 21.5) but costs 40× as much to run the benchmark ($428 vs $10.6; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Plus when you need intelligence above 21.5, and GPT-6 Luna (Low) when 21.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Low) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.5 | 25.2 | +17.2% Qwen3.7 Plus is 17.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $10.63 | $427.73 | +3923.8% Qwen3.7 Plus is 40× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 7.32s | 46.15s | +530.5% Qwen3.7 Plus is 530.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-6 Luna (Low): 17.2% more intelligence, 3923.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 530.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Low) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-6 Luna (Low)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-low/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-low/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill