GPT-6 Luna (Medium) vs Grok 4.6 (Medium)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Medium) by OpenAI or Grok 4.6 (Medium) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (Medium) scores 12.9 points higher (42.8 vs 29.9) but costs 50× as much to run the benchmark ($1557 vs $31.2; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.6 (Medium) when you need intelligence above 29.9, and GPT-6 Luna (Medium) when 29.9 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Medium) | Grok 4.6 (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.9 | 42.8 | +43.1% Grok 4.6 (Medium) is 43.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $31.17 | $1,557.04 | +4895.3% Grok 4.6 (Medium) is 50× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.25s | 33.09s | +301.1% Grok 4.6 (Medium) is 301.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.6 (Medium) vs GPT-6 Luna (Medium): 43.1% more intelligence, 4895.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 301.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Grok 4.6 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6 Luna (Medium)Grok 4.6 (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-medium/grok-4-6-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-medium/grok-4-6-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill