GPT-6 Luna (Medium) vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Medium) by OpenAI or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (Medium)
Solar Pro 3 vs GPT-6 Luna (Medium): 73.9% less intelligence, 410.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 128.8% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Medium) | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.9 | 7.8 | −73.9% Solar Pro 3 is 73.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $31.17 | $159.22 | +410.8% Solar Pro 3 is 5.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.25s | 18.88s | +128.8% Solar Pro 3 is 128.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
GPT-6 Luna (Medium)Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-medium/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-medium/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill