GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 7.3 points higher (25.8 vs 18.5) but costs 52× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $19.2; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 18.5, and GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) when 18.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.5 | 25.8 | +39.5% Kimi K2.7 Code is 39.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.16 | $992.88 | +5082.0% Kimi K2.7 Code is 52× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.98s | 46.75s | +838.8% Kimi K2.7 Code is 838.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning): 39.5% more intelligence, 5082.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 838.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill