GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K2 Thinking

GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K2 Thinking. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)Off the frontier
Intelligence
18.50
Total cost
$19.2
KimiKimi K2 ThinkingNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)Kimi K2 ThinkingDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)18.522.0+18.9% Kimi K2 Thinking is 18.9% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$19.16Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)5.07s22.51s+344.0% Kimi K2 Thinking is 344.0% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.50$0.60 / $2.50
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning): what beats itKimi K2 Thinking: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning/kimi-k2-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning/kimi-k2-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill