GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 27.8 points higher (46.3 vs 18.5) but costs 11× as much to run the benchmark ($207 vs $19.2; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro when you need intelligence above 18.5, and GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) when 18.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.5 | 46.3 | +150.3% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 2.5× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.16 | $206.66 | +978.6% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 11× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.07s | 48.82s | +862.9% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 862.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning): 150.3% more intelligence, 978.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 862.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill