GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) scores 29.6 points higher (48.1 vs 18.5) but costs 104× as much to run the benchmark ($2000 vs $19.2; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 18.5, and GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) when 18.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.5 | 48.1 | +160.0% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 2.6× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.16 | $2,000.35 | +10340.2% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 104× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.09s | 61.87s | +1115.5% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 1115.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning): 160.0% more intelligence, 10340.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1115.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill