GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) scores 26.6 points higher (45.1 vs 18.5) but costs 86× as much to run the benchmark ($1655 vs $19.2; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 18.5, and GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) when 18.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.5 | 45.1 | +143.8% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 2.4× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.16 | $1,655.27 | +8539.2% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 86× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.09s | 29.43s | +478.2% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 478.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) vs GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning): 143.8% more intelligence, 8539.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 478.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill