GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL scores 8.0 points higher (26.5 vs 18.5) but costs 15× as much to run the benchmark ($283 vs $19.2; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when you need intelligence above 18.5, and GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) when 18.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.5 | 26.5 | +43.2% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 43.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.16 | $282.51 | +1374.5% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 15× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.05s | 6.20s | +22.8% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 22.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning): 43.2% more intelligence, 1374.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 22.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill