GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603
GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | Step 3.5 Flash 2603 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.5 | 17.0 | −8.1% Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is 8.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.16 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.07s | 20.05s | +295.5% Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is 295.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.10 / $0.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning/step-3-5-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning/step-3-5-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill