GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Step 3.7 Flash
GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Step 3.7 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | Step 3.7 Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.5 | 19.5 | +5.4% Step 3.7 Flash is 5.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.16 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.02s | 20.66s | +311.6% Step 3.7 Flash is 311.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.20 / $1.15 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning/step-3-7-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning/step-3-7-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill