GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Step 5 Preview
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Step 5 Preview by StepFun? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Step 5 Preview scores 25.2 points higher (43.7 vs 18.5) but costs 62× as much to run the benchmark ($1190 vs $19.2; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Step 5 Preview when you need intelligence above 18.5, and GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) when 18.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | Step 5 Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.5 | 43.7 | +136.2% Step 5 Preview is 2.4× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.16 | $1,190.26 | +6112.2% Step 5 Preview is 62× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.01s | 12.01s | +139.7% Step 5 Preview is 139.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $1.00 / $2.70 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Step 5 Preview vs GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning): 136.2% more intelligence, 6112.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 139.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Step 5 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)Step 5 PreviewToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning/step-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning/step-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill