GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) vs GPT-6 Sol (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) by OpenAI or GPT-6 Sol (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (High) scores 7.8 points higher (42.4 vs 34.6) but costs 9.0× as much to run the benchmark ($605 vs $66.8; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Sol (High) when you need intelligence above 34.6, and GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) when 34.6 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) | GPT-6 Sol (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.6 | 42.4 | +22.5% GPT-6 Sol (High) is 22.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $66.81 | $604.52 | +804.8% GPT-6 Sol (High) is 9.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.32s | 22.47s | −20.7% GPT-6 Sol (High) is 20.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Sol (High) vs GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh): 22.5% more intelligence, 804.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 20.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6 Sol (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)GPT-6 Sol (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/gpt-6-sol-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/gpt-6-sol-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill