GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) vs Ministral 3 14B
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Ministral 3 14B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 28.6 points higher (34.6 vs 6.0) but costs 1.8× as much to run the benchmark ($66.8 vs $37.6; mid-range vs budget cost classes). Pick GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Ministral 3 14B.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) | Ministral 3 14B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.6 | 6.0 | −82.7% Ministral 3 14B is 82.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $66.81 | $37.56 | −43.8% Ministral 3 14B is 43.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.27s | 6.97s | −67.2% Ministral 3 14B is 67.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.20 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 14B vs GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh): 82.7% less intelligence, 43.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 67.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)Ministral 3 14BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/ministral-3-14b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/ministral-3-14b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill