GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) vs Mistral Small 3.2
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Mistral Small 3.2 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)
Mistral Small 3.2 vs GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh): 79.8% less intelligence, 82.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 64.7% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) | Mistral Small 3.2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.6 | 7.0 | −79.8% Mistral Small 3.2 is 79.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $66.81 | $121.78 | +82.3% Mistral Small 3.2 is 82.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.06s | 9.55s | −64.7% Mistral Small 3.2 is 64.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.07 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)Mistral Small 3.2Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/mistral-small-3-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/mistral-small-3-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill