GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) by OpenAI or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 25.7 points higher (34.6 vs 8.9) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($66.8 vs $63.7; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoni….
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.6 | 8.9 | −74.3% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 74.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $66.81 | $63.74 | −4.6% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 4.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.27s | 11.59s | −45.5% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 45.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.05 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) vs GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh): 74.3% less intelligence, 4.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 45.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill