GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) vs GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh): 47.4% less intelligence, 1241.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 63.8% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) | Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.6 | 18.2 | −47.4% Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reas… is 47.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $66.81 | $896.39 | +1241.7% Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reas… is 13× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.14s | 46.08s | +63.8% Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reas… is 63.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.38 / $2.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/qwen3-6-35b-a3b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/qwen3-6-35b-a3b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill