GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)
Qwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh): 27.2% less intelligence, 540.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 70.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.6 | 25.2 | −27.2% Qwen3.7 Plus is 27.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $66.81 | $427.73 | +540.2% Qwen3.7 Plus is 6.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.06s | 46.15s | +70.5% Qwen3.7 Plus is 70.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill