GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh): 73.4% less intelligence, 506.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 73.9% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.6 | 9.2 | −73.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 73.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $66.81 | $405.10 | +506.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 6.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.81s | 6.21s | −73.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 73.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill