GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) vs Solar Mini 4
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Solar Mini 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)
Solar Mini 4 vs GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh): 30.3% less intelligence, 651.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 29.1% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) | Solar Mini 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.6 | 24.1 | −30.3% Solar Mini 4 is 30.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $66.81 | $502.02 | +651.4% Solar Mini 4 is 7.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.27s | 27.46s | +29.1% Solar Mini 4 is 29.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.10 / $0.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Solar Mini 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)Solar Mini 4Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/solar-mini4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/solar-mini4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill