GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)
Trinity Large Thinking vs GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh): 68.8% less intelligence, 248.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 57.1% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.6 | 10.8 | −68.8% Trinity Large Thinking is 68.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $66.81 | $232.95 | +248.7% Trinity Large Thinking is 3.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 19.23s | 8.25s | −57.1% Trinity Large Thinking is 57.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill