GPT-6 Luna (Max) vs Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Max) by OpenAI or Muse Ember (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Muse Ember (Xhigh) vs GPT-6 Luna (Max): 22.2% more intelligence, 29.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 92.1% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Max) | Muse Ember (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 27.9 | 34.1 | +22.2% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 22.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $136.06 | $95.73 | −29.6% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 29.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 119.92s | 9.48s | −92.1% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 92.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Muse Ember (Max) scores 36.00 for $117.
- Muse Ember (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6 Luna (Max)Muse Ember (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna/muse-ember-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna/muse-ember-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill