GPT-6 Luna (Max) vs Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Max) by OpenAI or Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (Max)
Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) vs GPT-6 Luna (Max): 43.8% less intelligence, 838.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 14.1% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Max) | Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.1 | 21.4 | −43.8% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 43.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $122.05 | $1,145.36 | +838.4% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 9.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 97.63s | 111.41s | +14.1% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 14.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.60 / $3.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6 Luna (Max)Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna/qwen3-6-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna/qwen3-6-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill